A Case for a Multidisciplinary Response to Human being TraffickingВ Literary works Review
Steven M. DyerВ
NOVA Southeastern UniversityВ
Lawbreaker Justice InstituteВ
This kind of literature review will explore the victimology of individual trafficking. Especially it will addresses human trafficking victims from the United States and people who descends from outside the United States. The literary works will attempt to exhibit that low socioeconomic position and previous illegal medication use by the victims help the victimology of human trafficking.
As a result of the findings, this literature assessment will try to offer a all natural, community-based response to the patients of human trafficking simply by creating a a comprehensive, biopsychosocial community response in the usa. Research Inquiries
RQ #1: Does low socioeconomic position (SES) help the victimology of human trafficking? RQ #2: Does the preceding use of illegitimate drugs contribute to the victimology of human trafficking?
HOURS #1: Low SES leads to the victimology of individual trafficking HUMAN RESOURCES #2: Previous illegal medicine use plays a part in the victimology of man trafficking
IV #1: Low SYNS
IV #2: Prior Against the law Drug Use
DV: Human being Trafficking Victimology
Statement of the Problem
The issue of human trafficking has been around for centuries. Even so the response to human being trafficking by the criminal proper rights system in the usa has been slower and barbaridad across the various agencies on the federal, state, and local levels. This newspaper will provide a framework to get a local response which is replicable in communities all over the country to combat the ills of human trafficking by learning the victims with the crime.
When one looks at the subjects of individual trafficking it is readily noticeable that the victims must be split up into citizens states and noncitizens of the United States. It is essential to make this distinction from a criminological perspective because the typology of the two different types of patients are considerably different. The victims of human trafficking from foreign countries must first become illegally transferred into the Usa. These patients have no right to be in the United States and usually the traffickers have any recognition from the patients so then when they reach the United States, they can be less likely to leave the pack. This allows the traffickers to maintain control over the victims here in the United States. Once individuals victims have reached the United States dirt, they are " ownedвЂќ by a trafficker whom use them mostly for pressured labor or perhaps sex trafficking. The patients of man trafficking who also are Us citizens aren't as easily available to traffickers as are these from international countries because they are free here in the usa with identities which allow them be in this article. Therefore traffickers must recognize certain characteristics for potential victims and after that set up in order to control these people. This control can include kidnapping. However it is likely for traffickers to seek out subjects who can become readily manipulated voluntarily. Equally foreign and domestic victims of man trafficking could be identified in similar styles by using the a comprehensive model recommended in this conventional paper. The hypotheses addressed from this paper include:
HR #1: Low socioeconomic status (SES) contributes to the victimology of human trafficking HR #2: Prior illegitimate drug use contributes to the victimology of human trafficking Based on the stated hypotheses, the independent variables and dependent variable are: IV #1: Low SES
4 #2: Before Illegal Drug Use
DV: Human Trafficking Victimology
Simply by identifying the characteristics of the victims of individual trafficking, the criminal proper rights system can bring together the assets required to best overcome the offences associated with individual...
References: Banking institutions, D., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2011). Characteristics of suspected human trafficking indents, 2008-2010. Office of Justice Programs, U. H. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Burke, M. C. (Ed. ). (2013). Human Trafficking Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Daigle, L. E. (2013). Victimology: the essentials. Washington, D. C.: Sage Guides, Inc.
Pada Nicola, A. (2011). Exploring into human being trafficking: Problems and problems. In M. Lee (Ed. ), Human being Trafficking (pp. 49-72). New York, NY: Routledge.
GAO. (2006). Human trafficking: Better data, strategy, and reporting needed to enhance U. S. antitrafficking efforts in foreign countries. Washington, POWER: Government Responsibility Office.
Kendall, V. Meters., & Funk, T. M. (2012). Kid Exploitation and Trafficking: Examining the Global Issues and U. S. Replies. Plymouth, Uk: Rowman & Littlefield Marketers, Inc.
Polaris Project. (2014). Current federal government laws. Gathered September 21, 2014, by Polaris Project: http://www.polarisproject.org/
Schauer, E., & Wheaton, Electronic
Territo, L., & Glover, N. (2014). Criminal Analysis of Sexual intercourse Trafficking in the us. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor swift & Francis Group.